dagj
United Poster
that other guy
Posts: 360
|
Post by dagj on Jul 28, 2002 23:20:46 GMT -5
just a little more complex than that but yes smae principle.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nemesis on Jul 29, 2002 13:51:28 GMT -5
LOL they even cant survive in this advanced greenhouse they build for testing it for Mars.. let alone here on Earth.. ;D
|
|
dagj
United Poster
that other guy
Posts: 360
|
Post by dagj on Jul 29, 2002 16:57:33 GMT -5
mars is differnet. there ar eman y other factors built inot it. here on eart it would be quite easy. cool it, fortify it and have a little while..say a year or so the build it and oyu could surpport a couple hundred people indeffinatly. and a couple thousands for a few thousand years.
|
|
|
|
Post by CatBreath on Jul 29, 2002 22:16:42 GMT -5
yeah it should be easier on earth...
and dude whatchya talkin about?
there arent any ppl on mars....
|
|
|
|
Post by Nemesis on Jul 30, 2002 13:56:21 GMT -5
DUDE didnt ya read! It was a TEST on EARTH ;D
And btw; never say its easier on Earth. You dont know what the impact of the impact is.. besides that, you cannot compare it to Mars.
The greenhouse-test here on Earth proved we are NOT capable to provide everything we need if we got nothing to live from in the outside world.
I suggest you read up a bit to the exp. 
|
|
dagj
United Poster
that other guy
Posts: 360
|
Post by dagj on Jul 30, 2002 15:52:21 GMT -5
but give enough time and resources like i said and you can prepaare. a large scale green house would eb on a much bigger sclae than the mars project. that was a habitate. were talking a full blown self contained ecosystem of plant life. waste could be used as fertilizer, plants cleanse the air, food is porvided by the plants. nestle it down in the osuth pole and you could have heaters to melt ice for water. and have alreayd cooled area.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nemesis on Jul 30, 2002 16:05:00 GMT -5
Thats exactly what they did in this habitat too. And it just didnt work out that good as they expected. Plants died, insect driven into extinction (inside the habitat ofcourse).. therefrom conclude I that man just cannot provide itself a usefull environment to live in without nature the way it is today.
|
|
Bennu
United Poster
Seeker of Greater Truths
Posts: 389
|
Post by Bennu on Jul 31, 2002 13:12:48 GMT -5
If we can't build a small scale self contained eco system, how can we get a larger one to work? ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Nemesis on Jul 31, 2002 13:23:16 GMT -5
voilà.. atleast somebody who understood what i said ;D
|
|
dagj
United Poster
that other guy
Posts: 360
|
Post by dagj on Jul 31, 2002 15:47:34 GMT -5
if we cna perfect it. like i have said several times now. WE WOULD HAVE SOME TIME. it probably won't work but its not immpossible
|
|
Bennu
United Poster
Seeker of Greater Truths
Posts: 389
|
Post by Bennu on Jul 31, 2002 15:59:06 GMT -5
Yeah but we are talking about a scientific world that forgets to put brakes on satellites they want to retrieve  |
|
dagj
United Poster
that other guy
Posts: 360
|
Post by dagj on Jul 31, 2002 22:02:22 GMT -5
hmm..good point. were screwed
|
|
|
|
Post by CatBreath on Jul 31, 2002 22:56:24 GMT -5
not really theoretically it is possible... and we see it all around us..... i believe that with a lil tweeking of the mars thing we could have a working eco system in no time  |
|
|
|
Post by Nemesis on Aug 2, 2002 16:10:24 GMT -5
Yep ofcourse we got plenty of time ;D But STILL its not thát easy..
Besides that, you simply CANNOT make a thing for that much people.. for instance, if half the worldpopulation dies.. we still got the other half 
|
|
dagj
United Poster
that other guy
Posts: 360
|
Post by dagj on Aug 3, 2002 21:04:38 GMT -5
a few hundred people would be the max.
|
|
