|
|
Post by Nemesis on Jul 13, 2002 1:48:31 GMT -5
You're going nowhere smartass.. Negative would be if there werent ANY sightings at all 
BTW; about the Stealth Bomber.. F117.. (aka Duckwing);
- it cant fly mach 20+. The triangular thing could.
- triangular aircraft was way bigger than the Stealth Bomber.
- it wasnt even the Stealth Bomber to what it was compared with, but it was compared (or they said it to be) Aurora.
Your turn again. 
|
|
jimbo
United Member
The only true skeptic
Posts: 54
|
Post by jimbo on Jul 13, 2002 20:29:16 GMT -5
 I know you're really not that stupid...By negative I mean that it is nearly impossible to prove that aliens don't (there's your negative, in case you didn't notice) exist because we would have to search every inch of this damn planet looking for one. On the other hand, if a believer wants to find an alien and bring it to me, well that's how you would have to prove that aliens are visiting us. Hehe...for one thing, you wouldn't be able to see an object in such great detail if it was flying at mach 20. Secondly, who the hell is "they." And Aurora is a bright light show caused by the refraction of light in the upper atmosphere...what the hell? I think you might have used the wrong word there, soldier.
|
|
|
|
Post by Teej on Jul 13, 2002 22:11:57 GMT -5
Guys, let's take a few minutes and cool off. I don't think anyone wants to see it start to get like paranormal.com here.
Teej
|
|
|
|
Post by WitchBoy on Jul 13, 2002 22:48:19 GMT -5
if that happens in this post or in any other post in united, im going to lock it .  |
|
|
|
Post by CatBreath on Jul 14, 2002 20:32:37 GMT -5
cant ask a believer for proof?
why not?
not all believers believe blindly
although blind belief does exist....
which is probably the case in most paranormal things
|
|
|
|
Post by CatBreath on Jul 14, 2002 20:54:39 GMT -5
yes ppl try to hold back...
dont make this a flame war...
|
|
|
|
Post by Nemesis on Jul 14, 2002 23:10:42 GMT -5
Hehe...for one thing, you wouldn't be able to see an object in such great detail if it was flying at mach 20. And Aurora is a bright light show caused by the refraction of light in the upper atmosphere...what the hell? I think you might have used the wrong word there, soldier.
Aurora Borealis is the northernlight.. Soldier..
This plane im talking about is ALSO called Aurora.. It's a military project ;D
"They" are the people who seen the UFO.
About the proof-thing.. most ppl find this kinda proof not sattisfactionable enough.. The prob. with aliens (and other para things) is that most of the time you speak in a hypothetical way, but that doesnt mean there isnt any proof at all.. The proof can exist without anybody ever noticed it.. and hey.. i dont say aliens DO exist..
Ill just wait for the day they land in my backyard ;D
Witch; no need to close this one Relax
|
|
|
|
Post by Nemesis on Jul 14, 2002 23:18:45 GMT -5
yes ppl try to hold back..........
Neither Jimbo nor me wants to start a flamewar about the topic, as far as I can speak for myself and probably Jimbo too. |
|
|
|
Post by Teej on Jul 15, 2002 4:38:53 GMT -5
I know, but we don't want to see it start into one. Someone could take something the wrong way and that wouldn't be good.
Teej
|
|
|
|
Post by Nemesis on Jul 15, 2002 10:42:57 GMT -5
Well then.. why dont you close the topic then.. since people seem to have no trust no more.
|
|
|
|
Post by WitchBoy on Jul 15, 2002 14:20:00 GMT -5
im not gonna close this topic, as i do find this subject interesting.
but ...
if any of you are gonna start to flame, which i know you would not DARE do it here on this website.
i will close this and i will kick some ass.
so be warned.
now please continue this friendly discussion ;D
|
|
jimbo
United Member
The only true skeptic
Posts: 54
|
Post by jimbo on Jul 15, 2002 20:06:45 GMT -5
Then what was the real speed? The radar could easily pick that up. (If there even were radar records, which I'm beginning to doubt)
It can be called by both names...
|
|
|
|
Post by Nemesis on Jul 16, 2002 13:29:05 GMT -5
Borealis.. Australis.. ;D
The real speed? something arround mach 8.. not sure tho. Have to look that one up for you. There are real radar-records from it. Ill try to find some.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nemesis on Jul 16, 2002 13:29:55 GMT -5
Witch, dont dare me! ;D
I could have closed the topic way back No need to do so..
|
|
|
|
Post by Teej on Jul 16, 2002 18:19:11 GMT -5
Who says I don't trust you?? I am just thinking ahead.
Teej
|
|
I know you're really not that stupid...By negative I mean that it is nearly impossible to prove that aliens don't (there's your negative, in case you didn't notice) exist because we would have to search every inch of this damn planet looking for one. On the other hand, if a believer wants to find an alien and bring it to me, well that's how you would have to prove that aliens are visiting us. 
