|
|
Nature
May 27, 2002 23:38:51 GMT -5
Post by CatBreath on May 27, 2002 23:38:51 GMT -5
some ppl think that everything that comes from nature is good... i mean look at EVERY SINGLE FOOD PRODUCT you buy... natural bla bla bla... but nature is not necessarily good... there are lotsa poison in nature... and blood.... ppl didnt start violence we just took it another level like we did with everything else... i got carried away again  but thats phylsophy ;D |
|
GalleksieBunny
United Poster
ACK! PANIC AND RUN!!! (try not to run into a wall in the process tho...not a comfortable experience)
Posts: 442
|
Nature
May 29, 2002 6:13:36 GMT -5
Post by GalleksieBunny on May 29, 2002 6:13:36 GMT -5
no one said NATURE is ALL good... but NATURAL on the hand...well that's great...natural VS chemicals... well frankly I'd rather have somethign that was grown without the use of things created in a test tube in my body nature itself has bad things in it...that's a given but it's how you use the good things that counts... PLUR AND KISSIES  |
|
|
|
Nature
May 29, 2002 22:19:11 GMT -5
Post by CatBreath on May 29, 2002 22:19:11 GMT -5
so why are natural things better than chimical ones?
chimicals have been tested and suited EXACTLY for you!
|
|
GalleksieBunny
United Poster
ACK! PANIC AND RUN!!! (try not to run into a wall in the process tho...not a comfortable experience)
Posts: 442
|
Nature
May 31, 2002 2:42:34 GMT -5
Post by GalleksieBunny on May 31, 2002 2:42:34 GMT -5
yes, but it's the side effects that people worry about... besides there is always the possibility of becoming dependant and not realizing it and well let's face it...how much testing did they hafta do on the chemicals to make them work? who or what did they test on? and did anything blow up in the process? well anywhoz...PLUR |
|
|
|
Nature
Jun 1, 2002 23:08:32 GMT -5
Post by CatBreath on Jun 1, 2002 23:08:32 GMT -5
lol are u saying nature doesnt screw up?
nature doesnt kill?
(ICE AGES,VULCANOS ect...)
|
|
GalleksieBunny
United Poster
ACK! PANIC AND RUN!!! (try not to run into a wall in the process tho...not a comfortable experience)
Posts: 442
|
Nature
Jun 3, 2002 1:33:48 GMT -5
Post by GalleksieBunny on Jun 3, 2002 1:33:48 GMT -5
well of course nature kills...I'd have to be incredibly pretentious to say that it didn't but I'm saying is that with chemicals you can never be sure, never be sure when a teeny lil molecule isn't teh right one and it could hurt yo badly... I mean the risk is there with natural foods too but only if you go around eating everys single exotic plant that you see...if yuo stick to the safer natural stuff, then you'll be fine but if you take chemicals, well someones tiny screw up could be a whole lot more then tiny... anywhoz...PLUR and |
|
|
|
Nature
Jun 4, 2002 21:32:02 GMT -5
Post by CatBreath on Jun 4, 2002 21:32:02 GMT -5
but thats what im saying...
nature screws up too...
|
|
GalleksieBunny
United Poster
ACK! PANIC AND RUN!!! (try not to run into a wall in the process tho...not a comfortable experience)
Posts: 442
|
Nature
Jun 6, 2002 5:08:53 GMT -5
Post by GalleksieBunny on Jun 6, 2002 5:08:53 GMT -5
I coulda told ya that one a long time ago... ya ok nature can suck and will prolly eat you and kill you if you give it a chance but all natural is better then all chemical PLUR and |
|
|
|
Nature
Jun 6, 2002 22:18:45 GMT -5
Post by CatBreath on Jun 6, 2002 22:18:45 GMT -5
why??
|
|
GalleksieBunny
United Poster
ACK! PANIC AND RUN!!! (try not to run into a wall in the process tho...not a comfortable experience)
Posts: 442
|
Nature
Jun 10, 2002 14:21:49 GMT -5
Post by GalleksieBunny on Jun 10, 2002 14:21:49 GMT -5
because the chemical replacements are man-made and men are flawed even more so then nature... have you ever noticed that when scientists create something that they are SURE is going to work they almost always create another substance to counteract... how many cancers weren't existent before scientists started feeding us test-tube crap...? how many people died from natural causes instead of poisoning...? how many people were healthy then and how many are now? yes you may say that ok well they died younger but that's only because they worked themselves harder...not because of what they didn't eat... Have you ever wondered how many chemicals in food have been linked to causing or helping cancer along...? the answer: TOO many..food die color red-40(i think it's 40) is banned in the US due to the cancerous effects it has...well guess what all you canadian boys and girls...it's still here...and used PLENTY....I dunno where else it's used but I'm asuming that scientists haven't been completely honest wiht us... well ya...it's just my opinion...take it as you please PLUR |
|
|
|
Nature
Jun 10, 2002 22:34:36 GMT -5
Post by CatBreath on Jun 10, 2002 22:34:36 GMT -5
without these chemicals and science we would all be dead by 40 and there would be a hell lot less ppl in the world
remember that
|
|
GalleksieBunny
United Poster
ACK! PANIC AND RUN!!! (try not to run into a wall in the process tho...not a comfortable experience)
Posts: 442
|
Nature
Jun 13, 2002 14:01:20 GMT -5
Post by GalleksieBunny on Jun 13, 2002 14:01:20 GMT -5
would that be so bad? the world is overpopulated and without these chemicals people wouldn't strive or even feel the desperate need to live for such a long time... before it was natural to die by the time you were 40...now it's more like 80...sure you can get more done but what's the point...? you can see and do everything that you ever wanted before you are even 30 if you set your mind to it... think of it...the world is overpopulated now...people are starving away to nothing and what are these fabulous chemicals that make every John Doe live longer doing for them ? ! ? nothing...and why? because people want to live longer and in living longer they use more ressources and in using more ressources they force a family of 6 in someplace like Somalia to grieve over 2 or 3 of their children who died from starvation b/c someone lived an extra 20 years and used what could have kept them alive instead of dying a painful death to feed themselves and their family... how many people died in their sleep then instead of dying over a long painful period? now compare the stats to today... I'm not anti-science but I'm pro-life...I do believe science has gone too far with the greed for life...who really wants to live forever...? PLUR |
|
|
|
Nature
Jun 13, 2002 19:48:52 GMT -5
Post by CatBreath on Jun 13, 2002 19:48:52 GMT -5
there will be no dying without chemicals?!
ppl killed by lions, small pox, chicken pox
its all natural
though u do have a point there...
|
|
GalleksieBunny
United Poster
ACK! PANIC AND RUN!!! (try not to run into a wall in the process tho...not a comfortable experience)
Posts: 442
|
Nature
Jun 16, 2002 6:15:38 GMT -5
Post by GalleksieBunny on Jun 16, 2002 6:15:38 GMT -5
thanks for seeing that ;D and I didn't say that there would be no death without chemicals...I'm just saying it wouldn't be cause by human ignorance... of course there will be death...there will ALWAYS be death...and there always has been...but death is just a rite of passage...no biggie... PLUR |
|
|
|
Nature
Jun 16, 2002 21:36:22 GMT -5
Post by CatBreath on Jun 16, 2002 21:36:22 GMT -5
so death by nature is good and by chemicals is bad??  |
|
